header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Embargoes: ‘I saw it first!’

30 September 2022 / Mary Young , Rebecca Ryan
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
Placing restrictions on the sharing of draft judgments risks creating a host of problems for legal teams & their clients, as Mary Young & Rebecca Ryan explain
  • Seemingly in response to recent breaches of the embargo over draft judgments, some judges have begun to hand these down with additional conditions on circulation. 
  • Some drafts have been provided on extremely short notice, with parties or instructing solicitors first having sight of the judgment at practically the same time as the public and press. This can create difficulties for both clients and their legal teams, for a number of reasons.

It has long been the practice of civil courts who have reserved judgment to send a draft embargoed judgment to parties and their legal teams (counsel and instructing solicitors) in advance (usually a day or two) of the judgment being formally handed down publicly.

The purpose of handing down judgment in this way is ‘to enable the parties to make suggestions for the correction of errors, prepare submissions and agree

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

OUT WITH THE OLD… IN WITH THE NEW

OUT WITH THE OLD… IN WITH THE NEW Premium Content

New partner joins the Kent firm’s construction team

Experiment2

Experiment2 Premium Content

"With growing numbers of 'crypto' disputes hitting the courts in the Caribbean", Grant Carroll examines the latest power to be added to a liquidator’s arsenal

Experiment1

Experiment1 Premium Content

"With growing numbers of 'crypto' disputes hitting the courts in the Caribbean", Grant Carroll examines the latest power to be added to a liquidator’s arsenal

NEWS
Paul Magrath recalls the chequered history of law reporting prior to the establishment of a Council of Law Reporting in 1865
Mark Solon stresses the importance of experts knowing & following the rules
‘Lucy Keane assesses the damage after Paccar Inc v CAT drove a juggernaut through the UK” litigation funding industry’
"A ’ recent 'Employment' Appeal Tribunal ruling on gender-critical beliefs has brought human rights to the fore: Charles Pigott analyses a significant development for discrimination claims";
back-to-top-scroll